Wizard 201 — Assess current project

Mission mode: code exists but Forge / Blueprints practices are uneven.

What it is

Mission mode: code exists but Forge / Blueprints practices are uneven.

Parent: Wizard 201 — Mission modes.

When to use it

When the team needs an adoption-shaped plan without pretending the repo is greenfield.

Outcome

An adoption plan that respects legacy risk.

When not to use it

Do not use this mode to pretend greenfield when the real need is a narrow bugfix or release checklist — reserve Wizard time for alignment on how practices should evolve. If leadership only wants a readout of current maturity, summarize outside the Wizard and use a shorter session.

Inputs you need before the session

Input Why
What is already working (shipping, tests, ceremonies) Grounds the plan in reality
Audit or compliance drivers Shapes Understanding and Run plan
Named owners for ceremonies Makes adoption stick

Map to Wizard 101

See the twelve steps table in Wizard 101. For Assess current project, Understanding, Clarification, and Run plan usually carry more weight than Mission does for a brand-new idea.

Common mistakes

Mistake What to do
Boiling the ocean Pick one ceremony or artifact to standardize first
Hiding legacy risk Record it explicitly in Understanding
No named owner per gap One owner per gap class going into Recheck

Example scenario (mission mode)

Starting situation Mixed ADRs and no ceremony rhythm; shipping continues but audits complain about traceability.
Action taken Session emphasizes Understanding and Run plan with legacy constraints explicit; no pretend greenfield.
Expected result Adoption plan with named owners and a first ceremony to standardize without stopping the line.
What to check Recheck lists shrink or gaps are explicitly accepted with dates.

What to do next