Handbook
Phased delivery — ceremonies (prescriptive)
Below: typical **stage-gate** ceremonies. Adjust names to your PMO standard (PRINCE2, PMBOK, internal SDLC).
Phased delivery — ceremonies (prescriptive)
Below: typical stage-gate ceremonies. Adjust names to your PMO standard (PRINCE2, PMBOK, internal SDLC).
1. Initiation / charter (gate: project authorized)
Intent: C1.
| Inputs | Business case draft, high-level scope, constraints |
| Outputs | Signed charter; appointed PM; initial RAID |
| Participants | Sponsor (R), PM (R), key stakeholders (C) |
| Timebox | Project-sized (days–weeks) |
Agenda: problem statement → success measures → high-level scope → risks → decision.
2. Planning baseline (gate: plan approved)
Intent: C1 + C2.
| Inputs | Requirements outline, estimates, dependencies |
| Outputs | Baseline schedule, WBS, budget, communication plan |
| Participants | PM (R), BA (R), tech lead (R), sponsor (A on go) |
Meetings: planning workshop series; document baseline change rules.
3. Design review (technical gate)
Intent: C2 + C4 (quality of solution pre-build).
| Inputs | Design docs, NFR matrix, security/privacy assessment |
| Outputs | Approved design baseline or actions list |
| Participants | Tech lead (R), security/architecture peers (C), PM (O) |
Agenda: walkthrough → risks → decision / conditions.
4. Weekly status / steering prep
Intent: C3 + C1 (escalations).
| Inputs | Schedule variance, RAID updates, burn/EVM if used |
| Outputs | Decisions, escalations, comms pack |
| Participants | PM (R), team leads (R), sponsor (O unless steering that week) |
Timebox: 30–60 min.
5. Test readiness review (TRR)
Intent: C4.
| Inputs | Test plans, environments, entry criteria, traceability matrix |
| Outputs | Go to formal test / hold with actions |
| Participants | QA lead (R), tech lead (R), PM (R) |
6. UAT / acceptance
Intent: C4.
| Inputs | UAT scripts, training materials, stable build |
| Outputs | Signed acceptance or defect list with severity |
| Participants | Business owner (A), BA (R), PM (R), support (O) |
Prescriptive rule: Define objective acceptance (pass/fail per script), not “looks fine.”
7. Go-live / release readiness
Intent: C1 + E.
| Inputs | Release checklist, rollback plan, comms, support roster |
| Outputs | Go / no-go; dated release |
| Participants | PM (R), ops (R), sponsor (A), security (C) |
8. Post-implementation review (PIR)
Intent: C5 + C6.
| Inputs | Benefits measures, incident data, budget final |
| Outputs | Lessons learned register; follow-up actions |
| Participants | Sponsor (O), PM (R), BA, tech lead, operations (R) |
9. Quick I/O summary
| Ceremony | Primary output |
|---|---|
| Charter gate | Authorized project |
| Planning gate | Baselines |
| Design review | Technical approval |
| TRR | Test entry |
| UAT | Acceptance |
| Release readiness | Production go |
| PIR | Organizational learning |
10. Links
Canonical source
Edit https://github.com/autowww/blueprints/blob/main/sdlc/methodologies/phased/ceremonies-prescriptive.md first; regenerate with docs/build-handbook.py.