Handbook
Scrum — connection to the SDLC foundation
This blueprint treats **Scrum as a delivery methodology** that plugs into a **shared foundation**: **tracking** (spine + artifacts) and **ceremony intents** (C1–C6). Scrum does **not** replace the fou
Scrum — connection to the SDLC foundation
This blueprint treats Scrum as a delivery methodology that plugs into a shared foundation: tracking (spine + artifacts) and ceremony intents (C1–C6). Scrum does not replace the foundation; it defines how the team timeboxes work and who facilitates.
1. SDLC phases A–F (how Scrum maps)
| Phase | Scrum expression | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| A — Shape | Product Backlog ordering, stakeholder input, vision | PO leads; Developers may join discovery |
| B — Plan | Sprint Planning (part 1: what) | Select Product Backlog items for Sprint Goal |
| C — Build | Sprint execution, Daily Scrum | Increment emerges; no scope change that endangers goal without PO agreement |
| D — Verify | Sprint Review + Definition of Done | Integrated increment; feedback |
| E — Release | Potentially shippable increment; release cadence may differ from sprint | May batch releases; still one increment per sprint |
| F — Operate & learn | Sprint Retrospective; operational handoff if applicable | Improve process; feed Product Backlog |
Prescriptive rule: Every Sprint should touch B through E at minimum (plan → build → verify). A is continuous (backlog refinement). F is every sprint (retro) plus ongoing ops if you ship.
2. Tracking spine (mandatory link)
Scrum teams still maintain the blueprint tracking spine:
| Artifact | Scrum mapping |
|---|---|
| Intent / request | Often becomes Product Backlog item or epic; may start outside Scrum |
| Spec | Part of PBI acceptance; may live in ADR/spec doc linked from item |
| Plan | Sprint Backlog + Sprint Goal |
| Tasks | Sub-tasks on PBIs / technical tasks on board |
| PRs | Implementation slices toward Done |
| Reviews | Code review + DoD checks |
| Release | Ship decision; may align with sprint end or faster |
Prescriptive rule: Do not let the Scrum board replace traceability. Each PBI that ships should be linkable to spec/ADR and PRs in your tool.
3. Ceremony intents (C1–C6) ↔ Scrum events
| Intent | Primary Scrum event(s) | Secondary |
|---|---|---|
| C1 — Align & decide | Sprint Planning (goal + selection), sometimes backlog refinement | Stakeholder sessions before planning |
| C2 — Plan the slice | Sprint Planning (part 2: how), refinement | Task breakdown in sprint |
| C3 — Execute & unblock | Daily Scrum | Ad-hoc pairing, swarming |
| C4 — Review & quality | Sprint Review (stakeholder), implicit in DoD | Code review, test activities |
| C5 — Reflect & improve | Sprint Retrospective | Team-led improvement items |
| C6 — Knowledge share | Sprint Review (demo), sometimes refinement | Tech talks, documentation |
See ceremony foundation and methodology bridge.
4. Role archetypes (blueprint hats on a Scrum team)
| Scrum role | Typical archetype emphasis | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Product Owner | Sponsor proxy + Orchestrator (prioritization) | Accountable for value; not a committee |
| Scrum Master | Orchestrator (process) + Quality advocate (impediments to quality of practice) | Serves the team and org; does not own backlog |
| Developers | Implementer (primary) + Quality advocate (shared) | Cross-functional; shared accountability for increment |
Detail: Roles, archetypes & methodology titles, Scrum roles chapter.
5. What Scrum adds beyond the foundation
- Timebox: fixed-length Sprints.
- Accountabilities: PO / SM / Developers (three distinct roles).
- Commitments: Product Goal, Sprint Goal, Definition of Done (per Scrum Guide 2020).
- Events: Sprint, Planning, Daily Scrum, Review, Retrospective.
6. Anti-patterns (prescriptive “don’t”)
| Anti-pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| SM as project admin / note-taker only | SM protects Scrum theory; facilitates events |
| PO as sole “story writer” with no Dev input in refinement | Developers participate in refinement (C2) |
| Skipping retro when “busy” | Retro is non-negotiable for sustainable improvement |
| No increment at end of sprint | Replan; inspect why DoD / slicing failed |
7. References in-repo
https://forgesdlc.com/methodology-scrum.html— methodology summary + diagram- Scrum ceremonies → ceremony foundation — fork table C1–C6
- Software development lifecycle (SDLC) — phases and ceremony-intent overview
Canonical source
Edit https://github.com/autowww/blueprints/blob/main/sdlc/methodologies/scrum/foundation-connection.md first; regenerate with docs/build-handbook.py.