Handbook
Tracking challenges (separate from the foundation)
**Purpose:** document what is *hard*, misleading, or politically sensitive about engineering tracking — without bloating [`TRACKING-FOUNDATION.md`](TRACKING-FOUNDATION.md). The foundation stays small;
Tracking challenges (separate from the foundation)
Purpose: document what is hard, misleading, or politically sensitive about engineering tracking — without bloating Tracking foundation (single spine). The foundation stays small; this file holds the nuance.
| Doc | Role |
|---|---|
| Tracking foundation (single spine) | Stable model (identity, events, work units). |
| Methodologies (lenses on the tracking foundation) | Scrum, Kanban, phased, XP — how each uses the foundation. |
| This file | Limits and tensions — cross-cutting and per methodology. |
Cross-cutting challenges
| Challenge | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Commit time ≠ work time | Commits are a touch proxy, not duration. Capacity and “hours per role” need other data sources if decisions depend on them. |
| One email ≠ one person | Shared machines, multiple addresses, contractors — alias maps and policy reduce confusion; they don’t eliminate it. |
| Metric gaming | Any visible aggregate (commit count, LOC) can be gamed. Prefer work-unit completion and qualitative review over raw volume. |
| Rebuild vs source of truth | If aggregates are regenerated from git, history is honest but branch strategy and squash merges change narratives; document conventions. |
| Privacy & HR | Attribution can approach performance surveillance. Scope reporting to team/process improvement unless policy explicitly allows individual management use. |
Scrum-oriented challenges
| Challenge | Notes |
|---|---|
| Sprint commitment vs emergent work | Commits alone don’t show carry-over or scope change; the board or sprint backlog is still the source of truth for “what we promised.” |
| Capacity | Story points or hours in planning are not inferrable from git; foundation only supports proxies unless you log time or points elsewhere and join by work unit. |
| Ceremony prep | Review decks need outcomes (done items), not only activity; link events to closed work units, not open churn. |
Kanban-oriented challenges
| Challenge | Notes |
|---|---|
| Waiting time is invisible in git | Blocked work often produces fewer commits; flow metrics that ignore blockers look “healthy” when the team is stuck. |
| WIP limits | Git doesn’t know column WIP; you need board state (API or manual snapshots) or accept weak proxies. |
| Cycle time | “First commit to merge” is a rough proxy; true cycle time usually needs created → done from the tracker. |
Phased / Waterfall-oriented challenges
| Challenge | Notes |
|---|---|
| Gates and approvals | Sign-offs, hazard analysis, formal baselines are often outside git. The foundation tracks engineering touch; compliance lives in controlled artifacts or ALM tools. |
| Phase attribution | Same commit might touch “implementation” while actually fixing a requirements doc; path or REQ metadata must classify work units, not only file paths. |
| Variance to plan | Planned effort vs actual hours is not in git; phase reviews still need planned baselines from project data. |
XP-oriented challenges
| Challenge | Notes |
|---|---|
| Pairing | Invisible unless you use Co-authored-by, pairing tools, or explicit events. |
| TDD / quality | Test commits and CI results are orthogonal to the identity + work-unit spine; correlate in a quality stream, not by overloading “commit.” |
| Sustainable pace | Activity spikes don’t show burnout; don’t infer well-being from graphs. |
When to extend the foundation (without forking it)
- Add event types (e.g.
blocker_recorded,review_completed) when ceremonies repeatedly lack signal. - Add external joins (tracker API) when a framework’s core metric cannot be approximated from git alone.
Review
Revisit this file when:
- methodology changes (e.g. Scrum → Kanban),
- someone proposes a new KPI,
- compliance or HR asks for individual attribution.
Foundation: Tracking foundation (single spine) · Methodologies: Methodologies (lenses on the tracking foundation)
Canonical source
Edit https://github.com/autowww/blueprints/blob/main/sdlc/templates/sdlc/TRACKING-CHALLENGES.md first; regenerate with docs/build-handbook.py.